Having observed decay of Raduga 33 SL r2, some questions arise. This is the first decay I've seen. First a summary. Observed from long - 66 W Lat 45.5 N ( Saint John, NB, Can) Used 232.0247 elset from Allan Pickup and Satspy for predicted path through the sky. The path was accurate within 5 seconds and approx 2 degrees. Passed through bowl of big dipper at 00:47:00 UTC on Aug 20. The sat was at max brightness, approx -2, just prior to U. Maj. and before reaching max elevation above local horizon. Then appeared to slowly dim but remained visible with binoculars and glowing to loss near the NE horizon. Using the same elset in STSPLUS I plotted the sat for a few orbits. On the orbit prior to the reentry I observed, Raduga reached a perigee of only 43.4 nm over the North Atlantic at lat 45.3 Long -46 W. Is this accurate, how did it survive such a dip into thick air. Incidentally, this was in twlight at sea- might it have been observed? On the decay orbit (539) STSPLUS plots a path over the Baha Peninsula at 00:44, altitude 140 nm. Path crossed over the central US, the terminator running from E. Texas through the middle of Lake Superior. The sat was below 80 nm once E. of the terminator. Perigee was predicted at 54 nm 00:50 UTC. Questions. 1. This event should have been widly observed from central Canada and NE US. Any other posts/ sightings ? 2. If the STSPLUS plots are correct, this object survived a very low pass on the rev prior . Possible?- or is STSPLUS not reliable. 3. If it did survive the pass on rev 538- might the dimming I observed represent the sat climbing out of dense atmosphere again? Raduga's next pass was not attempted by me- but was favorible for N. A. observers. Finally, for those not lucky enough to see a decay, keep trying -it is spectacular! Steve Bolton